Disposed

Sangeeta Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Aug 2017CWJC/1408/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition complained that the Block Development Officer did not respect or comply with the Petitioner, an elected Pramukh of a Panchayat Samiti. The court directed the District Magistrate to resolve differences between the Panchayat Samiti and the officer.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gopalganj, to act as the person to sort out differences arising between the Panchayat Samiti and the Block Development Officer regarding functioning and

Sangeeta Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1408 of 2017

¶3

=========================================================== Sangeeta Singh Wife of Shailesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Budhsi Bhumihari Tola, Post and Block - Sidhwalia, P.S. - Mahmadpur, District - Gopalganj, at present holding the post of Pramukh, Sidhwalia, Prakhand Panchayat Samiti, Sidhwalia, District - Gopalganj.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gopalganj.

¶9

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj.

¶10

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Gopalganj.

¶11

The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sidhwalia, Block - Sidhwalia, P.S. - Mahmadpur, District - Gopalganj.

¶12

Dinesh Kumar Singh S/o not known At Present the Block Development Officercum Executive Officer, Panchayati Samiti, Sidhwalia Block, Sidhwalia, P.S. Mahmadpur, District - Gopalganj.

¶13

.... .... Respondent/s

¶14

======================= Appearance :	=======	=============================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Siya Ram Shahi with
		Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocates
For the State	:	Mr. Kumar Alok, SC 7 with
		Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to SC 7
For the Respondent No. 7	:	Mr. Sanjay Pandey with
=======================	=======	Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocates =============================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶16

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date: 04-08-2017

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1408 of 2017 dt.04-08-2017

¶19

2/3

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

Basically, the grievance of the petitioner, who is the elected Pramukh of Sidhwalia Prakhand Panchayat Samiti in the district of Gopalganj is that the Block Development Officer-cumExecutive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sidhwalia is not giving due respect to the Panchayat Samiti and also not complying with the directions issued to him.

¶22

From the pleadings, it appears that the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar has directed the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gopalganj to do the needful in the matter.

¶23

Learned counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition be disposed off directing the District Magistrate-cumCollector, Gopalganj to act as the person who should sort out any differences which may arise between the Panchayat Samiti, including the petitioner, and the Block Development Officer with regard to proper functioning and implementation of the decisions of the Panchayat Samiti.

¶24

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move before the respondent no. 3 as and when such occasion arises for any grievance which she or the Panchayat Samiti may have against the respondent no. 6 relating to

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.1408 of 2017 dt.04-08-2017

¶26

3/3

¶27

the smooth and proper functioning of the Panchayat Samiti and implementation of its orders.

¶28

Learned counsel for the State as well as the respondent no. 7 have assured the Court that the Block Development Officer shall discharge his duties relating to proper functioning of the Panchayat Samiti without any slackness. The respondent no. 3, as and when required, shall intervene in the matter to sort out the differences between the parties so that ultimately the Panchayat Samiti runs in accordance with law and the decisions taken by it, in accordance with law, are also implemented without any undue delay.

¶29

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶30

Anjani/-

¶31

AFR/NAFR U

Sangeeta Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangeeta Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeshwar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Binod Kumar Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nilu Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janak Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Atendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.