This was a Civil Writ Jurisdiction case where the petitioner filed a challenge against state officials in the education department. The petition was disposed of on the ground that it had been withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5436 of 2016
===========================================================
Md. Haider Ali Ansari Son of Md. Ejazul Haq Ansari Resident of Village- Parihar, PS Parihar, Block Parihar, District Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate For the State : Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 22-08-2017
As prayed for, by learned counsel for the petitioner,
the writ petition stands disposed off as withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
Md. Haider Ali Ansari
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education
The Director, Research and Training, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training Sitamarhi
The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi
The District Programme Officer, (Establishment) Samastipur
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
P. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
