Petitioners moved for quashing orders cancelling their appointments on non-est grounds. The court disposed of the writ petition by relying on a previous order in a similarly situated case (Sanjeet Kumar Baitha).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10320 of 2017
===========================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP-23
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 21-08-2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
“(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
Patna High Court CWJC No.10320 of 2017 dt.21-08-2017
2/3
order/orders or direction/directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 141 dated 22.04.2016 issued by District Education Officer, East Champaran whereby and whereunder the appointment of petitioners has been cancelled on non-est grounds in violation of principles of natural justice without giving any opportunity of hearing,
(ii) For further quashing the consequential order dated 22.04.2016 issued by District Programme Officer, Literacy, East Champaran in a pssyclostyled format directing the concerned Headmasters to cancel the appointment of petitioners,
(iii) For any other order/orders which the petitioners may found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
of the Court to the order dated 23.06.2017 passed in CWJC No. 10680 of 2016 in the case of Sanjeet Kumar Baitha and others vs. the State of Bihar and others . It was submitted that the petitioners are similarly situated.
the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10320 of 2017 dt.21-08-2017
3/3
in terms of the order dated 23.06.2017 passed in CWJC No. 10680 of 2016.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
S.Sb/-
AFR/NAFR N/A CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 25.08.2017 Transmission Date
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sanjeet Kumar Baitha and others vs. the State of Bihar and othersFollowed¶2
CWJC No. 10680 of 2016
Faiyaz Ahmed and others
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
