Disposed

Amresh Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Dec 2017CWJC/4424/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought compassionate appointment. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Mukesh versus State of Bihar, directed the respondents to take a final decision in accordance with that judgment within sixty days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to take a final decision in accordance with the Apex Court's decision in Mukesh versus State of Bihar within 60 days.

Amresh Kumar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4424 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Amresh Kumar Thakur, Son of Late Raj Kumar Thakur, Resident of village + Post - Takkipur, P.S. Maharajganj, District - Siwan

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna

¶9

The District Level Compassionate Appointment Committee through its Chairman, the District Magistrate, Siwan

¶10

The District Magistrate, Siwan

¶11

The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Siwan

¶12

The District Education Officer, Siwan

¶13

The District Programme officer ( Establishment ), Siwan

¶14

The Block Education officer, Daraunda, District Siwan

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar, AC to GP20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶19

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is required to be considered in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in SLP (C ) No. 5328 of 2012 (Vishwanath Pandey Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.).

¶20

Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that subsequent to this decision the Apex Court has recently decided the issue in the case of Mukesh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors: (2017)

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.4424 of 2017(2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2

¶22

5 SCC 387.

¶23

In view of the latest judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh (supra) the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take final decision in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh (supra) within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

spandey/-

¶26

Amresh Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amresh Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Malti @ Malti Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bishwanath Gupta and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Ajit Kumar

Vinod Kumar Prasad @ Vinod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamakhya Narain Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.