The Court referred to the Supreme Court judgment in Mukesh Kumar and ordered respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within 60 days, with benefits reaching the petitioner within one month.
Direction to respondents to take final decision on petitioner's representation within 60 days and ensure consequences within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10971 of 2017
======================================================
Kamakhya Narain Singh, Son of Late Brij Bihari Singh, Resident of Village- Koran Dihri, Police Station and Block- Sahar, District- Bhojpur at Ara.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhukar Mishra- Ac to Sc-16
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The grievance of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Ors: (2017) 5 SCC 387.
The petitioner has already approached before the respondent by filing representation contained in Annexure-7.
In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar (Supra), the respondents are required to take final decision on the representation of the petitioner within a
Patna High Court CWJC No.10971 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017
2/2
maxim period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the consequential benefit must reach to the petitioner within a further period of one month from the date of the decision by the respondent nos. 5 and 6, the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer, Bhojpur at Ara within a further period of one month.
With the aforesaid, the writ application stands
disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are required to decide on the petitioner's representation within 60 days of the Supreme Court judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & OrsReferred¶18
Mukesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Ors: (2017) 5 SCC 387 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamakhya Narain Singh
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara
The District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
