the recommendation of the Justice Agrawal Commission and disposal of the case by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the University fixed the date of absorption of the petitioner with effect from 13.08.1976, which was subsequently approved by the Syndicate on 27.02.2011. The University again modified the date of absorption and fixed it as 28.02.1982, which the petitioner assailed in CWJC No. 14438 of 2010 and the matter was remanded for the petitioner to approach the Vice Chancellor who was required to take a decision on the same. In terms thereof, the petitioner filed a representation before the Vice Chancellor on 06.02.2013 and on 08.02.2013, the original date of absorption of the petitioner was again fixed with effect from 13.08.1976 and in the said notification it was also mentioned that the Syndicate in its meeting dated 27.02.2011 had also approved such date. Thereafter, again by the order dated 10.11.2014, the University went back and re-fixed the date of absorption, changing it from 13.08.1976 to 28.02.1982. However, a letter was issued to the petitioner on 01.06.2015 to place her case before the Vice Chancellor on 10.06.2015, but in spite of the petitioner doing the same, nothing has happened. Learned counsel submitted that when the Hon’ble Supreme Court has decided the matter, it was not open to the authorities to subsequently to make any change with regard to the date of appointment of the petitioner and further, when twice the
