Disposed

Priyanka Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Aug 2017CWJC/3201/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent to promptly decide the petitioner's pending representation filed on 18.02.2017. It ordered the decision be made within one month of receiving this order. A consequential order is required within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the petitioner's pending representation filed on 18.02.2017 within one month.

Priyanka Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3201 of 2017

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Priyanka Rai, wife of Sri Shailesh Rai, resident at New Rattan Hatta, Post Office Purnea, Police Station Purnea District- Purnea.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Purnea.

¶9

The Senior Deputy Collector, Purnea.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Purnea.

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Purnea.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Dagarua, District Purnea.

¶13

The Executive Officer (Pramukh), Panchayat Samiti-Cum-Chairman, Block Teacher Employment Committee, Dagarua Block, District – Purnea Dagrua.

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s

¶15

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶16

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date: 18-08-2017

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶19

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the cause of action, he has also filed a representation before the respondent no. 4 on 18.02.2017, which is still pending and may be directed to be disposed off.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State submitted that the said representation shall be disposed off.

¶21

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2017, copy of which has been made

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.3201 of 2017 dt.18-08-2017

¶23

2/2

¶24

Annexure-15 to the writ application, expeditiously and in any case latest within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by him. Any consequential order, which is required to be passed, shall be done within the next four weeks.

¶25

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶26

P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U

Priyanka Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhola Nath @ Bhola Nath Gupta Vs The Biharsharif Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Kumari Kumkum Ray Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Kumari China Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Moina Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Muro Devi Vs The State Of Bihar