Disposed

M/s Baba Project Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC9 May 2017CWJC/2669/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that where the matter is sub judice before the appellate authority and the petitioner initially sought stay via appeal, parallel invocation of writ jurisdiction is not called for. The petitioner was directed to prosecute the appeal and was granted liberty to file an application for stay before the appellate authority within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; liberty granted to approach the appellate authority for stay within 15 days.

M/s Baba Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2669 of 2017

¶3

=========================================================== 1. M/s Baba Project Pvt. Ltd., N.T.P.C. Contractor Colony, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur through its site Incharge Jitendra Kumar, Son of Jeewan Lal Sharma, Resident of Saket Puri, East of Bahadurpur, Near Bazar Samiti, P.S.- Bahadurpur District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶7

1. The Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶8

The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶9

The Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, (Administration), Bhagalpur Circle, Bhagalpur.

¶10

The Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, (Appeal) Bhagalpur Circle, Bhagalpur.

¶11

The Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Bhagalpur Circle, Bhagalpur.

¶12

The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Bhagalpur Circle, Bhagalpur.

¶13

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, RMCC, Bariatu, Ranchi (Jharkhand).

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s

¶15

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushmita Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar- SC-11 Mr. Sriram Krishna, Advocate For S.B.I. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶16

and

¶17

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶18

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 09-05-2017

¶19

Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226

¶20

of the Constitution. The petition was filed on 17.2.2017 and a prayer

¶21

is made to stay the special mode of recovery initiated under Section 47 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

¶22

Shri Vikash Kumar appears on behalf of the State. He

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.2669 of 2017 dt.09-05-2017

¶24

2/3

¶25

receives notice and points out that application of the petitioner was pending consideration before the appellate authority. On 7.1.2017 the appeal was taken up for consideration. It was directed to be listed on 18.1.2017. On 18.1.2017, notice was issued to all concerned. An application for stay was already filed before the appellate authority on 7.3.2017, but all of a sudden, it was withdrawn on 20^th of March, 2017 and this petition is now being prosecuted.

¶26

Taking note of the objections raised by the learned counsel for the State, we are of the considered view that once the matter is subjudice before the appellate authority and initially the petitioner has invoked the appellate jurisdiction for stay, parallel invoking of the writ jurisdiction of this Court was not called for. The petitioner should prosecute the appeal, seek interim protection or stay from the appellate authority and only after adverse orders are passed or the application is decided by the appellate authority, a cause will accrue to the petitioner seeking exercise of extra ordinary Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution.

¶27

Accordingly, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of this writ petition, grant liberty to the petitioner to raise all grounds as are raised in the present writ

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.2669 of 2017 dt.09-05-2017

¶29

3/3

¶30

petition before the appellate authority and seek protection against the demand raised. On an application for stay being filed, the appellate authority shall decide the application for stay within a period of 15 days thereafter.

¶31

In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which the application is decided, he shall have liberty to challenge the same afresh in accordance with law.

¶32

With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of.

¶33

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶34

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶35

K.C.jha/-

¶36

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	N/A
UploadingDate	16.5.2017
Transmission Date	N/A

M/s Baba Project Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Baba Project Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Sharib Iqubal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Baban Prasad Vs The Registrar General Patna High Court and Ors.

Subodh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sarita Devi and Ors. Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Rajeshwar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeshwar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.