Disposed

Sachin Kumar Keshri and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Nov 2017CWJC/2640/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Patna High Court directed the District Education Officer to look into the petitioner's grievance and consider him for posting at Jamui block, following threats related to an intercaste marriage.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.4 to look into the grievance and consider the petitioner for posting at Jamui block if no legal impediment exists.

Sachin Kumar Keshri and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2640 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sachin Kumar Keshri, Son of Ranjeet Kumar Keshri, Resident of Village- Chakai Bazar, Post Office- Chakai, Police Station- Chakai, District- Jamui.

¶4

Durga Kumari Pandey, Wife of Sachin Kumar Keshri, Resident of Village- Chakai Bazar, Post Office- Chakai, Police Station- Chakai, District- Jamui.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

¶9

The District Education Officer-cum- District Programme Officer, Jamui.

¶10

The Block Education Officer, Jamui.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav- Gp23

¶14

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 17-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioners submits with reference Annexure-1 that petitioners have earlier approached this court in C.W.J.C. No. 692 of 2010 and the Division Bench of this court vide order dated 26.7.2010 issued direction considering the threat of family members of the petitioners on account of joining intercaste marriage.

¶17

He submits that threats are still continuing and as

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2640 of 2017 (4) dt.17-11-2017

¶19

2/2

¶20

such the case of the petitioners deserves to be considered sympathetically.

¶21

Considering the background of this case and in particular, Annexure-1, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.4 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and consider the case of the petitioner for posting at Jamui block, if there is no other legal impediment.

¶22

The respondent no.4 is oblige to pass a reasoned speaking order, if the petitioners files representation alongwith a copy of this order within three weeks from today, within a further period of two months from the date of filing of such representation.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶24

Ravi/-

¶25

Sachin Kumar Keshri and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Kumar Keshri and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagbir Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Ramadhar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Dr. Udai Prakash Singh and Ors.

Abdul Gafoor Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Randhir Kumar Singh Vs Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.