Dismissed
Ramadhar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/16301/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16301 of 2017
======================================================
Ramadhar Singh S/o Nirbhary Singh Resident of Village - Chandrahi, P.O. - Chirala, P.S. - Kasma, District - Aurangabad, who is the President of Samagra Sanskrit-Sah-Sanskrit Shikshak Kalyan Samiti, Aditya Arcade, Near Indira Bhawan Boring Canal Road, Patna - 800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D SANJAY (ADDL. SOC. GEN.) For the Board Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 16-11-2017
In the matter of appointment on the post of Gramin Dak Sevaks in Bihar Circle, this writ petition has been filed in public interest.
In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bholanath Mukherjee & Others Vs.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16301 of 2017 dt.16-11-2017 2/2
Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College & Others, (2011) 5 SCC 464, and the Delhi High Court in the case of Forum of SC and ST Legislators and Parliamentarians Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Another (WP (C) No.1698 of 2017) decided on 27.02.2017, a public interest litigation with regard to recruitment and service matter is not permissible. Therefore, the petition is disposed with liberty to the aggrieved person to take recourse of filing separate writ petition before the appropriate Bench.
The application is disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
K.C.Jha/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 23.11.2017 Transmission Date
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging recruitment through PIL is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ramadhar Singh
The Union of India
Rajendra Menon
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court