Writ application permitted to be withdrawn by this High Court as the underlying suit had been already decided; application dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioners permitted to withdraw the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22945 of 2013 (2) dt.09-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22945 of 2013
======================================================
Vijay Shankar Tripathi & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Hakim Mian & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER
2 09-10-2017 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application on the ground that the suit itself has been decided.
In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. Thus, it is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J)
Harish/-
U
Vijay Shankar Tripathi & Ors
Hakim Mian & Ors
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
