The Patna High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ application due to the underlying suit being decided, and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application granted. Writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22727 of 2013 (3) dt.09-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22727 of 2013
====================================================== Sripati Lal Gurda .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Sidheshwar Tiwary & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER
3 09-10-2017 The learned counsel, Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application on the ground that the suit itself has been decided.
In view of the submission, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ application. Therefore, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J)
Harish/-
U
Sripati Lal Gurda
Sidheshwar Tiwary & Ors
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
