Dismissed

Mahendra Bhuyian v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Dec 2017CWJC/2194/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble J. Anil Kumar Upadhyay held that the writ court cannot adjudicate serious disputed questions of fact. The petition is disposed of with liberty to approach authorities and a direction to dispose of grievances within six months.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stood disposed of. Liberty granted to petitioner to approach respondent authorities. Respondents directed to dispose of grievances expeditiously within six months.

Mahendra Bhuyian Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2194 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mahendra Bhuyian Son of late Lemu Bhuyian @ Lemu Manjhi Resident of Morama, P.O. Pataner, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Director, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Shiksa Pariyojana Parishad, Patna.

¶8

The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

¶9

The District Programme Officer( Sakshrata) Lakhisarai.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

¶11

The District Secretary, Bihar Zila Lok Shiksha Samiti, Lakhisarai.

¶12

The Block Secretary, Bihar Block Lok Shiksha Samiti Lakhisarai.

¶13

The Head Master, Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya, Morama District Lakhisarai.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP17 For Resp. BEPC : Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 04-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶19

The writ application involves serious disputed question of fact and as such the writ court is not inclined to adjudicate the dispute involved in the present proceeding.

¶20

Considering the nature of dispute where the respondents have seriously disputed the claim of the petitioner, the court is not inclined to issue any positive direction. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his grievances. In case the petitioner represents before the respondent-authorities, namely, the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.2194 of 2017(2) dt.04-12-2017 2/2

¶22

respondent no.4, he will look into the grievance on perusal of the representation and on the basis of the recorded available and if he finds substance in the claim of the petitioner, he shall pass positive order for payment. In the event he does not find any merit in the claim of the petitioner, he shall pass speaking order for rejecting the claim of the petitioner. The respondents shall dispose of the matter expeditiously preferably within a period of six months.

¶23

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

spandey/-

¶26

Mahendra Bhuyian v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Bhuyian v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Babu Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Laxmi Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Ekbal Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Munna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.