Petitioners in a writ petition under Civil Writ Jurisdiction sought permission to withdraw the application to represent the appropriate authority for grievance redressal. The court permitted the withdrawal.
The writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.760 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.760 of 2017(2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suneil Kumar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. MADHAW PRASAD YADAV-GP23 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 01-12-2017 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to enable the petitioners to represent the appropriate authority for redressal of their grievances.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
20 Petitioners
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar
The Director, Mass Education-cum-Additional Secretary, Bihar
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
The District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur
The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary, Block Literacy Committee, Kurhani
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
