Allowed

M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes and Ors.

Patna HC18 Mar 2017CWJC/19579/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, noting that the petitioner was denied a proper opportunity to produce evidence and documents during the assessment proceeding, allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; impugned assessment order quashed; matter remanded to Assessing Officer for fresh assessment after hearing within 60 days.

M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The Commissioner Of… — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19579 of 2016

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. A Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 through its Authorized representative/ Signatory Sudhir Kumar Singh Son of Sri Uday Shankar Singh Resident of S/368A, Opposite Rental Flat, 121, Lohianagar, PS Kankarbagh, District-Patna and having its Office at South of Sabajpura More, Thana No.-107, Khata No-645, Tauzi No.5486, Mauza-Nohsa, Near Star Oron House, Phulwari Shari, District-Patna,

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Patliputra Circle, Patna, Bihar having its Office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶8

The Assistant Commissioner, of Commercial Taxes, Patliputra Circle, Vikas Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶9

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, South Circle, Anta Ghat, Near Gandhi Maidan, Patna

¶10

.... .... Respondent/s

¶11

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha-GA-1 Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate

¶12

===========================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶14

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 18-03-2017

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that in passing the order of assessment under Section 25 read with Section 39 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, proper opportunity of producing evidence and documents has not been afforded to the petitioner and, therefore, this is a fit case where the petition should be allowed and the matter remanded back to the Assessing Officer.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.19579 of 2016 dt.18-03-2017

¶18

2/2

¶19

Accordingly, the petition is allowed, the order impugned dated 21.10.2016 (Annexure-1) is quashed. The petitioner shall appear before the Assessing Officer on 12^th of April, 2017 along with all evidence, documents and objections and on the same being done the assessing officer shall proceed to pass a fresh order of assessment in accordance to law within 60 days.

¶20

In case, the petitioner or his authorized representative fails to appear before the Assessing Officer on the date notified by this Court, i.e. 12^th of April, 2017, or does not show reasonable justification for his absence, the Assessing Officer shall be free to proceed in the matter without granting any further time to the petitioner.

¶21

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

K.C.jha/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	N/A
UploadingDate	21.03.2017
Transmission Date	N/A

M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamakant Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kameshwar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Raghubansh Prasad Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.