The High Court at Patna accorded permission to the petitioner to withdraw his anticipatory bail application pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO Act, Madhepura, and dismissed the same as withdrawn via oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13011 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2016 Thana -SHANKARPUR District- MADHEPURA
====================================================== Arbind Yadav
.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Smt Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 17-03-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 127/2016, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st -cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Madhepura.
Permission is accorded.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as
withdrawn.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arbind Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
