Allowed

Ram Dulari Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 May 2017CWJC/19578/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an interlocutory application to implead the Union of India and correct the petitioner's name. On merits, the court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation regarding the duplicate PPO before the PCDA (Pension), Allahabad.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner impleaded Union of India; name corrected; writ disposed of directing fresh representation before PCDA (Pension), Allahabad within four weeks and appropriate orders within six weeks.

Ram Dulari Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19578 of 2016

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Ram Dulari Devi Wife of late Dahin Ram Gram + P.O., Sonbhadra, Banshi Suryapur District-Arwal

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Arwal

¶7

The District Magistrate, Arwal

¶8

The Chief Manager State Bank of India, Mian Branch, Patna 4. The Assistant General Manager, Centralized Pension Processing Cell, Administrative Officer, 4th Floor, J.C. Road, patna-800001

¶9

The Branch Manager Pension Officer, Pension Cell, State Bank of India, Mian Branch, Jahanabad

¶10

Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad.

¶11

	.... .	... Respondent/s
=================	===============================	===========
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s	: Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Adv.
For the State	: Mr. A. Kr. Rastogi, AAG-X Ms Shilpi Keshri, A.C. to AAG-X
For the Union of India	: Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Dr. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC.
For the S.B.I. =================	: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv. ===============================	===========

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-05-2017

¶13

I. A. No. 2689 of 2017

¶14

By way of the present interlocutory application, the petitioner has made two prayers. The first prayer is to permit her to

¶15

add the Union of India through Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad as respondent no.6 and the second prayer is to permit her to rectify the mistake committed inadvertently

¶16

in the writ application whereby the name of the petitioner has been stated as Ram Dulari Devi, wife of Late Dahin Ram whereas the

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.19578 of 2016 dt.22-05-2017

¶18

2/5

¶19

exact name of the petitioner is Dulari Devi, wife of Late Dev Dahin Ram.

¶20

Dr. Punam Kumari Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India, Ms Shilpi Keshri, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.10 appearing for the State and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State Bank of India do not oppose the aforesaid prayers of the petitioner.

¶21

In that view of the matter, the prayer is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to implead the Union of India through Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad as respondent no.6 and rectify the name of the petitioner as given in the cause title of the writ application in the course of the day.

¶22

Interlocutory application stands allowed.

¶23

C.W.J.C. No. 19578 of 2016

¶24

In the present writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondent authorities to issue duplicate Pension Payment Order (for short ‘PPO’) for the purpose of starting her family pension.

¶25

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶26

that the husband of the petitioner was in Army and after his retirement he was getting his pension in his pension account in the State Bank of India, Jehanabad Main Branch in Account No.

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.19578 of 2016 dt.22-05-2017

¶28

3/5

¶29

35231415572. He died on 23.05.2015. It is stated that the petitioner Dulari Devi, who happens to be 92 years of age lost pension paper of her husband while she was going to her son-in-laws place on 08.03.2016 for which a Sanaha was lodged by her on 10.03.2016 before the Officer-in-Charge of Kalpa Police Station at Jehanabad. Thereafter, she approached the Branch Manager of the State Bank of India, Main Branch, Jehanabad with a request to grant her family pension on which the Branch Manager directed her to deposit PPO and other relevant documents on which the petitioner informed the Branch Manager with regard to her difficulty in providing the PPO and showed the Sanaha lodged by her in Kalpa Police Station but the Branch Manager did not respond positively. Subsequently, the petitioner wrote a letter to the Assistant General Manager, Centralized Pension Processing Cell, Patna for certified copy of the PPO, pursuant to which the Assistant General Manager, Centralized Pension Processing Cell, Patna vide his letter dated 06.07.2016 informed the petitioner to deposit a copy of the pension book along with copy of the FIR to the Pension Cell at Centralized Pension Processing Cell, Patna. Thereafter, the petitioner deposited all the relevant documents along with her letter dated 19.07.2016 as directed by the Assistant General Manager, Centralized Pension Processing Cell. However, no action was taken on behalf of the respondent

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.19578 of 2016 dt.22-05-2017

¶31

4/5

¶32

authorities on the request of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner has been compelled to file the instant writ application.

¶33

It is stated that after filing of the writ application the petitioner was in receipt of a letter dated 18.03.2017 issued under the signature of the respondent no.4, the Assistant General Manager, Centralized Pension Processing Cell, Patna informing her that PCDA (P), Allahabad has forwarded a copy of duplicate PPO from which it is apparent that the name of the family pensioner is not notified in the PPO. Accordingly, the petitioner has been advised to approach PCDA (P), Allahabad to issue PPO in her name so that family pension could be started at the earliest.

¶34

It is stated that pursuant to the advice of the respondent no.4, the petitioner represented before the PCDA (P), Allahabad on 24.03.2017 with a request to do the needful so that her family pension could be started but till date the petitioner has not received duplicate PPO and her family pension is not being paid. It is contended that the petitioner being a lady aged about 92 years is facing great hardship due to non-payment of family pension.

¶35

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation raising her grievance before the newly added respondent no.6, the Principal Controller of Defence

¶36

Patna High Court CWJC No.19578 of 2016 dt.22-05-2017

¶37

5/5

¶38

Accounts (Pension), Allahabad within four weeks from today along with a copy of the order and in case such a representation is filed, the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad is directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within six weeks thereafter and do the needful.

¶39

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶40

Pradeep/-

¶41

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	23.05.2017
Transmission Date

Ram Dulari Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Dulari Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Ayub Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hindustan Construction Company Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandra Sekhar Choubey and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Anant Pathak Vs The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Ors.

Jamun Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar and Ors.

Alok Prashun Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.