This is an oral order in a civil writ jurisdiction case. The applicant is Assistant Prosecution Officer Alok Prashun, deputed from Jahanabad. Counsel argued the application had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court dismissed the writ application as infructuous.
The writ application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15408 of 2015
====================================================== Alok Prashun S/o Late Mahendra Pratap resident of Mohalla- L-1/28, Sri Krishna Puri, P.S.- Shri Krishna Puri, Presently posted as Assistant Prosecution Officer, Civil Court, Jahanabad (Deputation on Arwal).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 22-05-2017 It is submitted by Mr. Binod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that due to passage of time, the application has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U
Alok Prashun
State of Bihar
Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar
Director of Prosecution, Department of Home Govt. of Bihar
District Prosecution Officer, Jahenabad
Ashvani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
