Petitioners filed a writ application claiming their grievance was redressed. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the application as infructuous.
Writ application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17149 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners Versus
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mrs Sunita Kumari, AC to AAG-13 For the University : Mr. Samir Kumar
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 11-10-2017 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. The same be kept on record.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed by the respondents vide Annexures-17 and 18 to the supplementary affidavit hence the present writ application has become infructuous.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.17149 of 2014 (3) dt.11-10-2017
2/2
parties, the present writ application stands disposed of as being
infructuous.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Amit/-
U
Lal Babu
Kumar Rajan
The State of Bihar
Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
