The application seeking liberty to withdraw was dismissed because it was not pressed by the learned counsel representing the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14240 of 2017
======================================================
The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India, 5th Floor Sashtri Bhawan, New Delhi110001.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondent
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushal Kr.Jha, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
3. 07-11-2017 Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel representing the Union of India seeks liberty to withdraw this application. Learned counsel for the UPSC has no objection.
Liberty is granted.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not
pressed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)
Rajeev/-
U
Union Of India
Manda Madhava Rao
The Secretary, Union Public Service Commission
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
