The Patna High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking compassionate appointment, upholding the Tribunal's rejection as factually sound. The prayer was denied.
Dismissal of the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14235 of 2017
======================================================
Parvati Devi, wife of Late Manoj Kumar, Resident of Gajadharganj, Station Road, Police Station – Buxar, District – Buxar (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
Perused the order of the Tribunal.
The rejection, for claim of compassionate appointment for
the reasons indicated therein, cannot be said to be erroneous.
Writ Application is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
skm/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the claim for compassionate appointment was erroneous.
Parvati Devi
Union Of India
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
