Disposed

Shailendra Kumar Sharma v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.

Patna HC28 Aug 2017CWJC/12238/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna disposed of this writ petition seeking post-retiral dues. Respondents filed a counter affidavit admitting payment, and the petitioner failed to file a rejoinder. The court accepted the stand taken by respondents.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed off as the petitioner failed to rebut the counter affidavit admitting payment of dues.

Shailendra Kumar Sharma Vs The Bihar State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12238 of 2016

¶3

=========================================================== Shailendra Kumar Sharma, son of late Devendra Prasad Sharma, Resident of Village- Dighara, Police Station- Pusa, District- Samastipur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar State Power ( Holding ) Company Ltd. through its Chairman-cumManaging Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶7

The Managing Director, Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd., Patna

¶8

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna.

¶9

The Administrator, Contributory Provident Fund Trust, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶10

The Administrator, Contributory Provident Fund trust, Transmission Circle, New Punaikchak, Patna.

¶11

The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone, New Punaichak, Patna.

¶12

The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Transmission Circle, New Punaichak, Patna.

¶13

.... .... Respondent/s

¶14

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondents no. 1,2, 4 and 7 : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent no. 3 : Mr. Prasant Singh, Advocate

¶15

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

Date: 28-08-2017

¶17

Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondents has appeared

¶19

and submitted that all admitted post retiral dues of the petitioner have

¶20

been paid and statement to this effect has been made in paragraphs no. 4 and 5 of the counter affidavit filed on their behalf. Copy of the counter affidavit was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on

¶21

23.12.2016, but there is no rejoinder to the same.

¶22

In view of the aforesaid, there is no reason for the

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.12238 of 2016 dt.28-08-2017

¶24

2/2

¶25

Court not to accept the stand taken in the counter affidavit and accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off.

¶26

Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 is present.

¶27

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶28

P. Kumar

¶29

AFR/NAFR U

Shailendra Kumar Sharma v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Kumar Sharma v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahanth Harendra Giri Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Laxman Prajapat Vs Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.

Hira Lal Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dilip Das Vs the Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts