Petitioner sought pension benefits for her late husband. The court dismissed the writ treating the husband as non-regularized work charge staff per a Division Bench precedent.
Writ filed by petitioner dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10638 of 2005
======================================================
Asturni Devi wife of late Ramadhar Ram, resident of village Bhatauli, P.S. and via Nawanagar, District Bojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA 5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 19-09-2017
Keeping in view the detailed decision of the Division Bench rendered on the identical point in the case of State of Bihar & others v. Bimli Devi, reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 452 , the entitlement of the petitioner's husband for payment of pension or family pension and retiral dues does not arise because it is an admitted fact that the husband was not regularized and he was in work charge establishment.
Writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 19.09.2017 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension or family pension and retirement dues when the husband was in work charge establishment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Bihar & others v. Bimli DeviFollowed¶15
State of Bihar & others v. Bimli Devi, reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 452
Asturni Devi
State of Bihar
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
