In a contempt application, the High Court disposed of the matter by dismissing the application as an interim issue regarding the meaning of bank rate can be decided in the pending writ application.
The contempt application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3095 of 2016 In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2399 of 2015
====================================================== M/s Surendra Prasad Singh through its Partner Surendra Prasad Singh S/O Late Ram Sagar Singh resident of Mohalla- Sarvodaya Nagar, P.S.- Town, District- Patna
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kundan Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp21 Awanish Nandan Sinha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
6. 15-09-2017 The Contempt Application stands disposed of.
So far as the argument as to what exactly the bank rate means, the issue has been raised by the petitioner by filing a writ application, such issue can be decided in the writ application. Dismissal of this Contempt Application will not come in the way.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
Rajeev/-
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the issue regarding the meaning of bank rate is better decided in the pending writ application rather than the current contempt application.
Surendra Prasad Singh
The State of Bihar
United India Insurance Company Ltd.
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
