Dismissed

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Mar 2017CR. MISC./12517/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving transporting liquor. The court noted that although the petitioner's name was disclosed by the truck driver, nothing was recovered from his possession. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail furnishing bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12517 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12517 of 2017

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2016 Thana -PIPRAKOTHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶5

====================================================== Kamlesh Kumar, Son of Sri Jagdish Rai, Resident of Village- Sondho Basdev, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahani, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 24-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶9

The petitioner seeks bail in Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 211/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

¶10

The police intercepted a truck bearing registration no. HR74-8823 and apprehended Gobind Singh the driver of the truck. The police recovered huge quantity of Indian made foreign liquor. The driver of the truck disclosed the name of 07 persons including the petitioner Kamlesh Kumar and stated that they all are involved in transporting the liquor from Punjab to Bihar.

¶11

It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12517 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017

¶13

possession of the petitioner. There is no chit of paper showing that the petitioner took any consignment for transportation of Indian made foreign liquor from Punjab to Bihar.

¶14

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the name of the petitioner figured in the disclosure made by the driver of the truck, but nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 211/2016.

¶15

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶16

Vinita/U T

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kora Vs The State Of Bihar

Amarjeet Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Pappu Vs The State Of Bihar

Kishor Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Dubey @ Mithelesh Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Chitranjan Panjiyar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar