Allowed

Sikandar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC18 Jul 2017CR. MISC./6680/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed bail to the petitioner in a Section 498A PC case involving dowry allegations. The court noted that reconciliation had occurred, the parties resumed conjugal life, and the wife had no further complaint against the husband.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail upon surrender within six weeks, furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Sikandar Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6680 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2016 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- BANKA

¶3

====================================================== Sikandar Yadav, S/o Bhola Yadav, Resident of Village-Dhanauchhi, P.S.Chandan, District-Banka.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner.

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Lalita Devi, W/o Sikandar Yadav, R/o Village-Dhanauchhi, P.S. Chandan, District-Banka, at Present R/o Village her parents house - Thebari, P.S.-Katoria, District-Banka

¶8

.... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. For the State : Mr. For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶9

¶10

7 18-07-2017 The petitioner and the opposite party no.2 alongwith their children and their respective counsels are present.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.07 of 2016 registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

The petitioner and the opposite party no.2, who are husband and wife respectively, submit that the misunderstanding in between them has now been removed and both are living together since 25.06.2017 and at present, the opposite party no.2

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6680 of 2017 (7) dt.18-07-2017 2/2

¶15

has no complaint against her husband (petitioner).

¶16

Since the petitioner and the opposite party no.2 started to lead their conjugal life afresh and the opposite party no.2 has no complaint against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Complaint Case No.7 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶17

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶18

P.S./-

¶19

U T

Sikandar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikandar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ram Prasad Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Parikshan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Shailendra Kumar Mishra Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Asharfilal Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dilkeshwar Paswan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.