Allowed

Raju Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Jul 2017CR. MISC./740/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner faced with charges under Sections 498A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relying on a settlement reached via the High Court Mediation Centre.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Raju Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.740 of 2017 (5) dt.17-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.740 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -324 Year- 2015 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District-

¶4

MADHEPURA

¶5

====================================================== Raju Kumar, Son of Sarjan Sharma, Resident of Village-Navtolia, P.S.Parsaha, District- Khagaria.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Komal Kumari, Wife of Raju Kumar, D/O Vinay Sharma Resident of Village- Dhana-Wasa, P.O.- Durgapur, P.S.- Puraini, District- Madhepura.

¶10

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rub(App)

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 17-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 324C of 2015 registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 are husband and wife and on the prayer of the learned counsel for both the parties, matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna, for settlement of the dispute between both parties, in which, both

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.740 of 2017 (5) dt.17-07-2017

¶18

parties have settled their dispute and also put their signature on the compromise, which is the part of report dated 29.06.2017 of Mediation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura, in connection with Complaint Case No. 324C of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶21

Bhardwaj/-

¶22

U T

Raju Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tuntun Kahar @ Tuntun Kumar @ Tuntun Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Vicky Baitha Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Prasad Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Parikshan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Jamal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar