Allowed

Md. Dilshad Kha @ Dilshad Khan @ Md. Dilshad Khan @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Mar 2017CR. MISC./6598/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, directing him to furnish a bond and sureties to the Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Md. Dilshad Kha @ Dilshad Khan @ Md. Dilshad Khan @ Sonu Vs… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6598 of 2017 (3) dt.09-03-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6598 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)

¶4

====================================================== MD. DILSHAD KHA @ DILSHAD KHAN @ MD. DILSHAD KHAN @ SONU s/o Md. Haji Kha @ Md. Haji Khan, r/v- Akbarpur, P.S. + District - Rohtas

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 09-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶8

The petitioner seeks bail in Rohtas P.S. Case No. 148/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 312, 315, 420, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶9

The prosecutrix alleged that she was in love with the petitioner for last four years. On 22.07.2016 the petitioner informed her on mobile that he would not marry with her. The petitioner demanded different articles in dowry. She further alleged that on account of physical relation, she became pregnant two years ago, but the petitioner got her aborted.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a major girl aged about 22 years. She was having

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6598 of 2017 (3) dt.09-03-2017

¶12

relation with the petitioner out of her free will. No offence under Section 376 is made out.

¶13

Considering the facts aforesaid and the allegation made against the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dehri in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No. 148/2016.

¶14

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶15

Vinita/U T

Md. Dilshad Kha @ Dilshad Khan @ Md. Dilshad Khan @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Dilshad Kha @ Dilshad Khan @ Md. Dilshad Khan @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Jalal @ Jalla and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharamdeo Yadav @ Dharmdeo Yadav @ Dharamdeo Singh @ Dharmdeo Singh @ Dhermdeo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sharwan Kumar @ Shrawan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dilip Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Dadan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Prakash Chandra Thakur @ Prakash Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Department, Bihar, Patna and Anr.