Amarjeet Das v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in custody charged with unnatural offence on a 5-year-old minor under POCSO and IPC 377. Bail rejected due to severity of allegation against a child supported by medical report.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail is rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6498 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -76 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAKAMHESI District- SAMASTIPUR
======================================================
Amarjeet Das, Son of Mallu Das, Resident of Village- Kanjoujar, Ghat, Salha, P.S.- Chakehshi, District- Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner
The State of Bihar
Versus .... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Surya Narayan Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nityanand, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 12-04-2017 Heard.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Chakmaheshi P.S.Case No.76 of 2016 pending in the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge-Ist, Samastipur registered for an offence under Section 377 of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a POCSO case involving unnatural offence on a five-year-old child supported by medical evidence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amarjeet Das
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sanjay Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court