Allowed

Arbind Tiwari @ Bablu Tiwari v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC27 Nov 2017CR. MISC./56452/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner facing Section 498A IPC charges. The court allowed release on bail bonds if the petitioner surrenders or is arrested within six weeks, citing conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail within six weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to furnishing bail bonds and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Arbind Tiwari @ Bablu Tiwari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56452 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶4

====================================================== Arbind Tiwari @ Bablu Tiwari, Son of Kedar Tiwari, Resident of VillageUttari Madhubani, Pandey Tola, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Anuradha Devi, W/o Arbind Tiwari alias Bablu Tiwari, D/o Shyam Narayan Tiwari, Resident of Village- Uttari Madhubani, Pandey Tola, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran. at present resident of Village and P.O.- Dulma, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 27-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

¶12

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶13

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56452 of 2017 (2) dt.27-11-2017

¶15

2/2

¶16

petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶17

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Complaint Case No. 118C of 2016, Trial No. 2322 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

U.K./U T

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Arbind Tiwari @ Bablu Tiwari v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Tiwari @ Bablu Tiwari v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Kumar Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Munna Khatik @ Munna Kumar and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sanjur Alam Ansari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kumari Renu and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sujata Kumari and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sheeraz Ahmad @ Faizi and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.