Allowed

Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Nov 2017CR. MISC./55561/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to two petitioners in custody accused of offences under various sections of the IPC. The alleged crime involved a dispute during a religious procession. The court enlarged them on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.55561 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2017 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma, S/o Sipahi Seth @ Sipahi Singh,

¶5

1. Mohit Kumar Verma @ Mohit Kumar Varma @ Mohit Kumar, S/o Harishankar Verma, Both resident of Village- Nokha, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Sri Shekhar Harshvardhan For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

2 29-11-2017

¶11

Heard Sri Y.C. Verma, learned senior counsel, assisted

¶12

by Sri Shekhar Harshvardhan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶13

Two petitioners, who are in custody since 03.10.2017 in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 299 of 2017, registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 353, 436, 427, 504, 153(A), 295A, 505C of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 have prayed for grant of bail.

¶14

By way of referring to the F.I.R., learned counsel for the petitioners submits that while procession of Maa Durga statue was moving, dispute had taken place in between two

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55561 of 2017(2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2

¶16

communities and Police maliciously protecting one community has arrayed number of persons of the other community as accused and petitioners, without any specific allegation, have also been made accused as member of the mob.

¶17

Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that petitioners are in custody, let both the petitioners Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma and Mohit Kumar Verma @ Mohit Kumar Varma @ Mohit Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas / concerned court in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 299 of 2017 .

¶18

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶19

praful/-

¶20

U T

Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Kumar @ Raj Kumar Verma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Mahto Vs Union Of India Through Intelligence Officer, Patna Zonal Unit, Narcotics Control Bureau, Ministry O

Ram Narayan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Old Secret

Biteshwar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Smt. Pragati Raj Vs Shishir Kumar

Pappu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shri Bhagwan Singh @ Bhagwan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar