The High Court dismissed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the opposite parties, finding no merit in the vague allegation that they were threatening witnesses. The court held the application lacked substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5348 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -899 Year- 2015 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR District- -
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 15-02-2017 This is an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the opposite parties by order dated 24.04.2016 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14038 of 2016.
There is vague allegation in the petition that the opposite parties are threatening the informant and witnesses as ground for cancellation of bail.
I do not find any merit in this application. This application is dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
Vats/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the orphaned allegation of threats against witnesses warrants cancellation of bail.
Pankaj Kumar
The State of Bihar
Shivji Rai
Prakash Kumar
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
