Dismissed

Dheeraj Kumar @ Shivam @ Abhishek Raj v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2017CR. REV./84/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order disposing of a criminal revision, the Patna High Court dismissed the plea for bail without interfering with the lower courts' decision. However, it directed the Juvenile Justice Board to complete the inquiry under Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice Act within four months.

What did the court decide?

Directed Juvenile Justice Board to complete inquiry under Section 14 of Juvenile Justice Act within four months.

Dheeraj Kumar @ Shivam @ Abhishek Raj Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Revision No.84 of 2017

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Dheeraj Kumar @ Shivam @ Abhishek Raj son of Harishchandra Mahto Resident of village Waristola Nawagarhi, P.S. Naya Ram Nagar District Munger, under the Guardianship of cousin brother namely Rajesh Kumar s/o Dinesh Prasad Singh, resident+village Amari, P.S. Darhara, District Munger.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... .... Opposite Party

¶9

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶10

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-02-2017

¶11

The petitioner is a child in conflict with law having been made accused in Muzaffarpur P.S. Case No. 230/15 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27(1) of the Arms Act. He is in remand home after having been apprehended in the said case and his prayer for release on bail has been rejected by order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Munger. The appeal preferred against the said order has also been dismissed by learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Munger vide order dated 20.12.2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2016. This is how the present criminal revision application has been filed against the said order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board seeking

¶12

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.84 of 2017 dt.14-02-2017

¶13

2/2

¶14

release of the petitioner on bail.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the informant that before the Juvenile Justice Board four witnesses have been examined under Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

¶16

In view of the above, this application is disposed of without interfering with the order passed by the appellate court below and the Juvenile Justice Board is directed to expedite the conclusion of inquiry against the petitioner under Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice Act, within a period of four months from the date of receipt/communication of the present order. If the inquiry is not completed within the aforesaid period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in accordance with law.

¶17

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶18

Ranjan/-

¶19

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	18.02.2017
Transmission Date	N.A.

Dheeraj Kumar @ Shivam @ Abhishek Raj v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dheeraj Kumar @ Shivam @ Abhishek Raj v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramashish Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hari Lal Paswan Vs Indu Devi

Md. Aslam @ Kallu Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mritunjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Firoj Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chamari Miya @ Gulam Noor Miya Vs The State Of Bihar