Allowed

Md. Tajemul Hussain @ Md. Tajemul v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2017CR. MISC./51769/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner who was arrested on mistaken identity in a theft and mischief case involving the cutting of electric wires. He had no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj.

Md. Tajemul Hussain @ Md. Tajemul Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51769 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2017 Thana -PAHARKATTA District- KISANGANJ

¶3

====================================================== Md. Tajemul Hussain @ Md. Tajemul, Son of Hanif, Resident of VillageLukudra, Police Station Paharkatta, District Kishanganj

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶5

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Firoz Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 04-12-2017 Heard the counsels for the parties.

¶8

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paharkatta P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 379, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The informant received information that about six persons riding an auto have been apprehended by the villagers and from their possession materials meant for cutting electric wire has been recovered. When the informant arrived at the place of occurrence, other accused persons had fled away, but only the petitioner was present. On the statement of the petitioner, the aforesaid FIR was lodged against other persons who have been named by him.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51769 of 2017 (3) dt.04-12-2017

¶11

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been arrested on mistaken identity. He is a mechanic and is not at all involved in cutting electric wire. The statement which has been given by him before the police is only an imagination of the local police.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody since 22.07.2017.

¶14

Regard being had to the fact that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and is in custody since 22.07.2017, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶15

In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Paharkatta P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017.

¶16

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶17

KKSINHA/-

¶18

U T

Md. Tajemul Hussain @ Md. Tajemul v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tajemul Hussain @ Md. Tajemul v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Alok Kumar @ Golu Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhutani Sahni @ Bhutta Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Yejaj Ahmad @ Munna Ansari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Satendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar