Allowed

Moor Salim v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./50064/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application regarding charges of Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, the High Court ordered the petitioner's release on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, noting no criminal antecedent and no witness tampering allegations.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Moor Salim Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50064 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2870 Year-2015 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Moor Salim, Son of Md. Taiyab, Resident of Village-Bajeedpur, P.S. Barsoi, District-Katihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Albeli Nisha, Wife of Moor Salim, D/o Md. Niyajuddin Resident of Villagehariharpur, P.S. Azamnagar, District-Katihar.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Musowir, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajballabh Singh, APP For opposite party No.2 : Mr. Md. Qumrul Hoda, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.7.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50064 of 2017(2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2

¶16

the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶17

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is ordered that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with C.A. Case No.2870 of 2015.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Narendra/-

¶21

U T

Moor Salim v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moor Salim v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Milan Kumar Premi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Basuki Nath Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijnam Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar