Allowed

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./49710/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment case. The petitioner must surrender within six weeks and furnish surety bonds totaling Rs. 30,000 under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the C.J.M.

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49710 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4992 Year-2016 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan son of Jainuddin Khan, resident of village Deurnawa, P.S. Bhorey, District Gopalganj

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Bihar

¶8

Tamanna Khatton w/o Sarukh Khan D/o Safi Khan, vill. Deura, P.O. Ahiapur, P.S. Bhorey, Dist. Gopalganj, at present Shyampur, P.O. Sathi, P.S. Uchakagaun, Dist. Gopalganj

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SRI SURESH PRASAD SINGH ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49710 of 2017(2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2

¶16

of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Complaint case No.4992 of 2016 (Trial No.369 of 2017), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Narendra/-

¶21

U T

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Milan Kumar Premi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Basuki Nath Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijnam Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramautar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar