Allowed

Ramautar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./49810/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising from a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving possession of foreign liquor, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond and two sureties, noting non-compliance with Section 100 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the CJM Darbhanga.

Ramautar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49810 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2017 Thana -BAHERI District- DARBHANGA

¶3

====================================================== Ramautar Yadav, age about 56 years, S/O Late Yadunandan Yadav @ Yadunanday Yadav, R/V- Belhi, P.S. Baheri, District-Darbhanga.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Shama Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh -5, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶6

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.06.2017 in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶7

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the police searched the house of this petitioner and other co-accused Pappu Yadav and recovered 200 Litters and 190 ML foreign liquor from their house.

¶8

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. 200.190 liters of foreign liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of this petitioner and other co-accused

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49810 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017

¶10

2/2

¶11

Pappu Yadav. No compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. has been made in the present case.

¶12

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has

¶13

been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Darbhanga, in connection with G.O. Case No. 311/2017(arising out of Baheri P.S. Case No. 45/2017).

¶15

U.K./U T

¶16

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Ramautar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramautar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Milan Kumar Premi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Basuki Nath Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Saruf Khan @ Sarukh Khan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijnam Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar