This court confirmed the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down in the earlier order dated 22.09.2016.
Confirmed provisional anticipatory bail granted in Cr. Misc. No.38690 of 2016 dated 22.09.2016, subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38690 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2016 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38690 of 2016 (3) dt.18-01-2017
2/2
instituted just a day prior thereto at the instance of the petitioners’ side. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Md. Ibrarul/Chandran
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the provisional anticipatory bail granted by this Court in Cr. Misc. No.38690 of 2016 dated 22.09.2016 should be confirmed in the present criminal miscellaneous application.
Whether the petitioners apprehend arrest while investigating for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suresh Yadav
Bhikham Rai
Saheb Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
