Allowed

Sonu Kumar Pandey @ Prince Kumar Pandey @ Sonu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./49677/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, Sonu Kumar Pandey, in a criminal bail application challenging an order in P.S.Case No. 199 of 2017, ordering release on furnishing bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West

Sonu Kumar Pandey @ Prince Kumar Pandey @ Sonu Pandey Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49677 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -199 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SONU KUMAR PANDEY @ PRINCE KUMAR PANDEY @ SONU PANDEY, son of Pramod Pandey, resident of village-Khairatiya, P.S.Manuapul, District-West Champaran at Bettiah (Bihar)

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.P. Pandey, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari, APP

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 17-10-2017 Heard Shri B.P. Pandey learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bettiah Muffassil (Manuapul) P.S. Case No. 199 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The allegation against the petitioner is assaulting the father of the informant with farsa resulting in injury which is said to be simple in nature as would be culled out from Annexure-3 at page-25 of the present petition.

¶10

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶11

the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent, the allegation levelled against the petitioner is false. However, in any view of

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49677 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017

¶13

2/2

¶14

the matter, the injury inflicted is simple in nature and moreover, the present case is a result of the case filed by the petitioner on the same day at an earlier point of time against the informant side. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in jail since 21.08.2017.

¶15

For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, the petitioner, namely Sonu Kumar Pandey @ Prince Kumar Pandey @ Sonu Pandey is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Muffassil (Manuapul) P.S. Case No. 199 of 2017.

¶16

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶17

S.Sb/-

¶18

U T

Sonu Kumar Pandey @ Prince Kumar Pandey @ Sonu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Kumar Pandey @ Prince Kumar Pandey @ Sonu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ujjawal Kumar @ Ujjawal Prasad and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arvind Ojha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Sohail Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Raju Vs The State Of Bihar

Nagendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar