Allowed

Fantush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2017CR. MISC./4951/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Miscellaneous petition by a prisoner sought release on bail. The single judge allowed the bail petition, releasing the petitioner on ₹10,000 bond with two sureties subject to specific conditions regarding offense-free conduct and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, subject to standard conditions.

Fantush Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4951 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2016 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER

¶3

====================================================== Fantush Yadav, son of Lakhan Yadav, resident of Village- Navtoliya Bindwara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP

¶9

======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 10-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2016 in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 125 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 47 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as recovery of English wine has been made from the field of co-accused Sudho Yadav with which the petitioner has no concern. Similarly situated co-accused Malta Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 50966 of 2016.

¶14

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 125 of 2016 with the following conditions:

¶15

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4951 of 2017 (3) dt.10-02-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

petitioner.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

B.T/-

¶23

U T

Fantush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fantush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Laxmi Enterprises Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Shushil Kumar Mandal @ Shuhil Mandal @ Shushil Mandal @Shahil Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Tarkeshwar Pasi @ Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar