Allowed

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Feb 2017CR. MISC./5452/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Bench oral order granting bail to the petitioner in police case No. 171/2016 for alleged offences under Section 394 IPC, upon furnishing a bond with two sureties and complying with standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount and compliance with specified conditions.

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5452 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma Son of Sri Prabhash Sharma Resident of Village- Jhandupur P.S. Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party

¶7

====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Kumar,Advocate For the State : APP

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

2 08-02-2017

¶11

The petitioner is in custody since 05.10.2016 in connection with Naugachia P.S.Case No. 171 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and no recovery of any incriminating articles have been made from his possession. Except his self confession before the police, there is no material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶13

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5452 of 2017 (2) dt.08-02-2017

¶15

¶16

thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Naugachia in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 171 of 2016 on the following conditions -

¶17

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶18

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

Chandran/Ibrar

¶23

U T

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jokhan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Rishideo Vs The State Of Bihar

M/s Laxmi Enterprises Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shushil Kumar Mandal @ Shuhil Mandal @ Shushil Mandal @Shahil Vs The State Of Bihar

Tufani Chaudhary @ Tufani Chaudhry Vs The State Of Bihar