Allowed

Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./48998/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Naveen Jha in a police case under Section 307 IPC. The court released him on bail bond with sureties upon satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties upon satisfaction of CJM, Darbhanga, subject to conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.

Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Kumar Jha Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48998 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -358 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Kumar Jha S/o Kalikant Jha, R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga, At present R/o Mohalla- Vidyapatti Nagar, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga

¶4

.... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP 173

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 17-10-2017 Heard both sides.

¶7

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 358 of 2017 under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The informant alleged that while she had gone to Court to attend her case, her father-in-law and brother-in-law called her and asked her to withdraw the case. The informant refused, but, her father-in-law and brother-in-law misbehaved with her and also assaulted her mother. The informant alleged that at the instance of her in-laws, the petitioner has been keeping watch over the informant.

¶9

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an Advocate Clerk. The petitioner was not even present at the time of occurrence, but, the informant made only allegation that he has been keeping watch over her.

¶10

Considering the facts, aforesaid, and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48998 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

receipt of this order, he is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 358 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

¶14

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶15

SA/-

¶16

U √ T √

Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Navin Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vikash Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Babita Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Binay Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sudha Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Suraj Deo Yadav @ Surya Deo Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar