Allowed

Ranjeet Raushan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Oct 2017CR. MISC./48881/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 323, 498A, and 506 of the IPC. The petitioner was to surrender within six weeks and provide bail bonds to the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for surrender within six weeks, with bail bonds of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Ranjeet Raushan Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48881 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjeet Raushan, Son of Late Bhola Chaudhary, Resident of villlage- Patori, P.S.- Moro, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. AHTASH ALI KHAN, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48881 of 2017(2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2

¶16

Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Darbhanga Mahila P.S. case No.06 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Narendra/-

¶21

U T

Ranjeet Raushan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Raushan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Salim Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu And Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vishwanath Kumar @ Vicky @ Vishwanath Shroff @ Vicky Kumar Shroff @ Viswanath Sarraf @ Vikki Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.