Allowed

Subhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Nov 2017CR. MISC./48231/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in connection with a case under Section 414 IPC. The petitioner was in custody since March 2017 and was not named in the FIR but was implicated based on a co-accused's confession. The court fixed a bond with sureties and specific conditions regarding the bailor's relationship and the petitioner's appearance in court during the trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Subhash Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48231 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2017 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subhash Yadav Son of Devan Yadav @ Deo Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Posdaha, P.S. - Narpatganj, District - Araria (Bihar).

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 29-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.03.2017 in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2017, G.R. No. 408 of 2017 for offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on secret information that one Amlesh Yadav had brought a looted motorcycle, the police raided and arrested the said co-accused Amlesh Yadav and on his confessional statement the name of the petitioner transpired.

¶15

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48231 of 2017 (3) dt.29-11-2017

¶17

2/3

¶18

petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the First Information Report and it is only on the confessional statement of co-accused Amlesh Yadav that he has been made accused in the present case. He submits that the said Amlesh Yadav has been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 34191 of 2017 on 17.08.2017, charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses by the petitioner.

¶19

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioner does to have a clean antecedent and is involved in five more cases some of serious nature.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2017, G.R. No. 408 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :

¶21

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48231 of 2017 (3) dt.29-11-2017

¶23

3/3

¶24

will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) Petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶26

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶27

Rajesh/-

¶28

U T

Subhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munchun Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanahaiya Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anuj Yadav @ Anoj Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Indu Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Mahto @ Sudhir Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar