Allowed

Munchun Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Nov 2017CR. MISC./46388/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge passed an oral order in a bail application under Section 386 IPC. The Court allowed the petitioner, a veteran criminal in custody, to be enlarged on bail, incorporating specific conditions regarding sureties, appearance, and attendance at police station.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to specific conditions regarding appearance and attendance.

Munchun Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46388 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -533 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Munchun Sah Son of Late Ramekbal Sah, R/o Village- Dharohara, P.O.Khartari, P.S.- Chiraiya , District- East Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kuar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 28-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶6

APP for the State.

¶7

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.03.2017 in connection with Motihari (Town) P.S. Case No. 533 of 2016 for offences punishable under Section 386 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that he received a call on his mobile from a number from Nepal asking Rangdari of 20 lakhs otherwise threatened for dire consequences.

¶9

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the F.I.R. and his name surfaced only on his own confessional statement in another case

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46388 of 2017 (3) dt.28-11-2017

¶11

2/3

¶12

before the police and confessional statement of one Sonu Pratap Singh. He submits that no overt act has been committed and just because he has criminal antecedent, he has been made accused in the present case.

¶13

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioner is a veteran criminal and as many as 26 cases, out of which he has been acquitted in 10 cases, are pending against him. He submits that some of them are of serious nature and the petitioner is a habitual offender.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Sadar Motihari in connection with Motihari (Town) P.S. Case No. 533 of 2016, subject to the conditions that:

¶15

(1) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶16

(2) Petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46388 of 2017 (3) dt.28-11-2017

¶18

3/3

¶19

cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶20

(3) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶21

(4) The petitioner will also appear before the concerned police

¶22

station and mark his attendance in the first week of every month till one year, failing which, his bail bonds will be cancelled.

¶23

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶24

Devendra/-

¶25

U T

Munchun Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munchun Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sintu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dilip Choudhary @ Dili Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Nabisa Khatoon and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanahaiya Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anuj Yadav @ Anoj Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Laddan Sah @ Laddu Sah @ Laddan Kumar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.