Allowed

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Oct 2017CR. MISC./48039/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case arising under Sections 498(A), 326, 341, 323, 504/34 IPC and D.P. Act. The court ordered release upon surrender within six weeks subject to bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks after furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Anshu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48039 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2017 Thana -KHODABANDPUR District- BEGUSARAI

¶4

====================================================== Anshu Kumar S/o Raj Kumar Singh Resident of Village-Pahsara, P.S. Naokothi, District-Begusarai.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶7

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 326, 341, 323, 504/34 of the IPC and ¾ of the D. P. Act.

¶8

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶9

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48039 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

¶11

2/2

¶12

Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶13

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Manjhaul, Begusarai, in connection with Khodwandpur P.S. Case No. 91/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

U.K./U T

¶16

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Salim Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu And Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vishwanath Kumar @ Vicky @ Vishwanath Shroff @ Vicky Kumar Shroff @ Viswanath Sarraf @ Vikki Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.