Allowed

Md. Salam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 Oct 2017CR. MISC./47585/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench of this High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment case. The court ordered bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, noting the petitioner had no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the CJM, East Champaran at Motihari.

Md. Salam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47585 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -210 Year- 2017 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Salam Son of Ishrail Mian, R/o Village- Pipra Banjariya, P.S.Banjariya, District- East Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Manisha Khatun W/o Md. Salam and D/o Khalil Mian, Presently , R/o Village- Kabari Tola Barganiya, P.S.- Barganiya, District- Sitamarahi.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of D.P. Act

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2017. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47585 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

¶18

2/2

¶19

Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque

¶20

Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶21

On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. case No.210 of 2017.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

Amit/-

¶25

U T

Md. Salam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Salam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Salim Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu And Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vishwanath Kumar @ Vicky @ Vishwanath Shroff @ Vicky Kumar Shroff @ Viswanath Sarraf @ Vikki Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.