Dismissed

Branch Manager National Insura v. Kitaban Khatoon and Ors.

Patna HC18 Sept 2017MA/348/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a Motor Accident Tribunal award. The court held the award correct as it allowed the insurer to recover the amount from the vehicle owner in case of permit breach. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without hearing respondents. Relief: Appeal dismissed; Tribunal award upheld.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; Impugned Judgment and Award upheld; Impugned order to pay compensation to claimant sent to Tribunal for adjustment.

Branch Manager National Insura Vs Kitaban Khatoon and Ors. — Insurance | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Appeal No.348 of 2010

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Branch Manager National Insurance Company Ltd., Sri Nandan Path near petrol pump Salempur P.S.-Chapra, Town District-Saran represent through Shri Anjani Kumar working as A.O. and duly constituted attorney of National Insurance Company having its Regional Office at 4^th Floor, Sone Bhawan, P.S. Sahiwalaya, District-Patna.

¶5

.... .... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Kitaban Khatoon W/o Fool Mohammad @ Kool Mohammad (deceased) R/o village-Arawa Kothi, P.O. Nagara, P.S. Khaire, District-Saran

¶8

Amit Kumar Singh S/o Braj Kishore Singh R/o Village-Dahiawan Tola-Tari P.O-Tari PS-Chapra Mufasil, District-Saran Owner of the Truck its bearing Reg. no. BR04A9586

¶9

Mohamad Jahir Hussan

¶10

Md. Nazir Hussan both sons of Fool Mohammad @ Kool Mohammad (deceased) R/o village-Arawa Kothi, P.O.-Nagara P.S. Khaire, District-Saran.

¶11

Fatama Begum W/o Sahibdeen daughter Late Full Md. R/o village-Olhanpur, P.S. Marhowrah, District-Saran.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. SHAILENDRA KUMAR For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-09-2017

¶15

From perusal of record, it appears that this appeal stood

¶16

dismissed on 08.08.2017 against the respondent no. 3, but as the respondent no. 3 who happens to be son of the deceased (Ful Mohamad) and another son, wife and daughter of the deceased are on record and their share in the awarded amount is divisible. Hence, this appeal against rest of the heirs of the said deceased is maintainable.

¶17

Ref: Interlocutory Application no. 4573 of 2010

¶18

The aforesaid interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 25 days made in filing the appeal with the case that after obtaining certified copy of the Judgment and Award, it

¶19

Patna High Court MA No.348 of 2010 dt.18-09-2017

¶20

2/3

¶21

took times in processing the file right from Branch Office to Regional Office and finally the file was handed over to the learned counsel of the Company for preparation of the memo of appeal and after preparing the same, the appeal was filed on 13.04.2010. Thus, there has been no deliberate latches on the part of the appellant in filing the aforesaid appeal rather the delay occurred due to aforesaid reasons.

¶22

It is settled principle of law that the justice should be done after hearing the parties and injustice should not be done by shutting down the hearing merely on technical grounds.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the aforesaid delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing and the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed accordingly.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on this Miscellaneous Appeal and perused the records.

¶25

No one turned up on behalf of the respondents.

¶26

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has assailed the impugned Judgment and Award passed by the learned Tribunal merely on the ground that the offending vehicle was being plied without permit in utter violation of terms and conditions of the policy, hence the appellant (Insurance Company) is not liable to pay any compensation to the claimant.

¶27

On perusal of record, it appears that the learned Tribunal

¶28

has awarded the final compensation to the tune of Rs. 62,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of presentation of the

¶29

Patna High Court MA No.348 of 2010 dt.18-09-2017

¶30

3/3

¶31

case till its realization and directed the Insurance Company to pay the aforesaid amount of compensation and interest thereon to the claimant within two months from the date of the impugned order with liberty to realize the said amount from the owner of the offending vehicle in case it finds any breach in terms and conditions of the policy.

¶32

As the learned Tribunal has already given liberty to the appellant to realize the compensation amount and interest thereon from the owner of the offending vehicle after making payment of the same to the claimant in case of any breach of terms and conditions of the policy, in my considered opinion, the impugned Judgment and Award appears to be correct and appropriate and does not require any intervention in the appeal. Accordingly, the impugned Judgment and Award passed by the learned Tribunal is upheld and this appeal is dismissed.

¶33

Let the statutory amount deposited by the appellant be sent to the learned Tribunal towards adjustment in the payment of compensation amount.

¶34

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶35

rohit/-

¶36

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	23.09.2017
Transmission Date	N.A.

Branch Manager National Insura v. Kitaban Khatoon and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Branch Manager National Insura v. Kitaban Khatoon and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bichhu Mandal @ Vijay Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Maya Devi @ Savitri Devi Vs State of Bihar

Renu Sinha Vs The Union Of India Through The General Manager, Eastern Railway, Kolkata

Binay Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Parmeshwar Yadav and Anr. Vs the United India Insurance Com

Pramod Kumar Vs Renu Devi and Ors.