Allowed

Santu Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2017CR. MISC./45851/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving assault and attempted murder arising from a land dispute. The court granted bail after noting the existence of a counter-case and the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents with simple injuries to the victim.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged petitioner on regular bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa at Nalanda.

Santu Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45851 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -386 Year- 2017 Thana -HILSA District- NALANDA

¶3

(BIHARSHARIFF)

¶4

====================================================== Santu Ravidas, Son of Bijendra Ravidas, Resident of Village- Kurtha, P.S.Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hilsa PS case no. 386 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(A), 380, 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The allegation of the prosecution against the petitioner and other accused persons is assaulting the prosecution party with lathi , iron rod etc. resulting in injury to one Rahul Kumar.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a bonafide land dispute prevailing between the parties and on the same day and for the same occurrence, case and counter case had been filed. It is further submitted that the father of the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45851 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

petitioner is said to have filed Hilsa PS case no. 388 of 2017 dated 17.06.2017. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the injuries suffered by Rahul Kumar is said to be simple in nature. The petitioner is said to be languishing in custody since 15.07.2017.

¶14

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa at Nalanda in connection with Hilsa PS case no. 386 of 2017.

¶15

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J.)

¶16

rinkee/-

¶17

U T

Santu Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santu Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar @ Satish Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhim Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lav Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Nand Kishore Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.