Dismissed

Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2017CR. MISC./45324/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail petition, stating that since prosecution witnesses have been examined and the trial is near its end, bail is not warranted despite the petitioner's long jail term. The court directed the trial court to conclude the hearing within two months. The appeal was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Bail dismissed; trial court directed to conclude hearing within two months.

Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45324 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45324 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2015 Thana -GOVINDPUR District- NAWADA

¶4

====================================================== 1. Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay, S/o Jagdeo Yadav, Resident of village- Harnarayanpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Nawada.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

4 08-11-2017 Heard Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶8

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 22.09.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22449 of 2015 and vide order dated 11.01.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.35064 of 2016 with a direction to the trial court to conclude the trial within six months from the date of receipt of this order but the trial could not be concluded and the petitioner again filed this bail petition. Vide order dated 01.11.2017, the S.P., Nawada was directed to appear in Court. In pursuance of the order aforesaid, the S.P., Nawada is present in Court and submitted by filing affidavit that all the prosecution witnesses have already been

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45324 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017 2

¶10

examined. Of course, the petitioner is in jail for more than 2½ years but since all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the trial is at its fag end, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail petition is dismissed. The trial court is directed to conclude the hearing as soon as possible and dispose of the case preferably within two months. The personal attendance of S.P. is dispensed with.

¶12

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶13

Saurabh/-

¶14

U T

Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rita Kumari Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Mahendra Kumar Mishra and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Devendra Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Kamal Ashraf Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Heera Kumar @ Heera Babu @ Hira Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar